On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 12:00 PM <action-request@mailman.swcp.com> wrote:

Send Action mailing list submissions to
action@mailman.swcp.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/action
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
action-request@mailman.swcp.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
action-owner@mailman.swcp.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Action digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. HJR 9 (exception to anti-donation clause for broadband)
(Akkana Peck)
2. Re: HJR 9 (exception to anti-donation clause for broadband)
(Barbara Calef)
3. Re: HJR 9 (exception to anti-donation clause for broadband)
(Barbara Calef)
4. Re: HJR 9 (exception to anti-donation clause for broadband)
(Akkana Peck)
5. Re: HJR 9 (exception to anti-donation clause for broadband)
(George Richmond)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 15:59:03 -0700
From: Akkana Peck <akkana@shallowsky.com>
To: action@lwvnm.org
Subject: [LWVNM Action] HJR 9 (exception to anti-donation clause for
broadband)
Message-ID: <20210207225903.GS2277@shallowsky.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

We didn't discuss HJR 9 at Friday's meeting, but it's coming up for
discussion on Monday morning along with HB10 (the broadband bill we
support). HJR 9 proposes a constitutional amendment to add
"essential household services" (infrastructure that allows internet,
electric, natural gas, water or wastewater services to be connected
to a domicile) as an exception to the anti-donation clause, so the
state could help subsidize (for example) fiber for broadband that
for-profit corporations aren't interested in installing. It's
sponsored by Allison and Chandler.

I support HJR 9 personally, and I think we can support it under
our high-speed internet position, but I wanted to check with you
experts before saying so at the committee hearing.

...Akkana

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 16:56:30 -0700
From: Barbara Calef <bfcalef@gmail.com>
To: LWVNM Action <action@mailman.swcp.com>
Subject: Re: [LWVNM Action] HJR 9 (exception to anti-donation clause
for broadband)
Message-ID:
<CAOurJ_YtZVJEivWAMB1N45oHov9v0Do9gsVzn5e8WfV9D3F6UQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I think we can and should support the CA. Thanks, Akkana!

Barbara

On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 3:59 PM Akkana Peck <akkana@shallowsky.com> wrote:

> We didn't discuss HJR 9 at Friday's meeting, but it's coming up for
> discussion on Monday morning along with HB10 (the broadband bill we
> support). HJR 9 proposes a constitutional amendment to add
> "essential household services" (infrastructure that allows internet,
> electric, natural gas, water or wastewater services to be connected
> to a domicile) as an exception to the anti-donation clause, so the
> state could help subsidize (for example) fiber for broadband that
> for-profit corporations aren't interested in installing. It's
> sponsored by Allison and Chandler.
>
> I support HJR 9 personally, and I think we can support it under
> our high-speed internet position, but I wanted to check with you
> experts before saying so at the committee hearing.
>
> ...Akkana
> _______________________________________________
> Action mailing list
> Action@mailman.swcp.com
> https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/action
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.swcp.com/pipermail/action/attachments/20210207/121d9340/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 17:31:17 -0700
From: Barbara Calef <bfcalef@gmail.com>
To: LWVNM Action <action@mailman.swcp.com>, Akkana Peck
<akkana@shallowsky.com>
Subject: Re: [LWVNM Action] HJR 9 (exception to anti-donation clause
for broadband)
Message-ID:
<CAOurJ_bVtZhY3V=9xtGAa9WDahZFTyZBd6ihwycSrDQ-E9Gwkg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Akkana,

The hearing is on Tuesday:

Tuesday, February 9, 2021 - 08:30AM - Room ZOOM

Barbara

On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 3:59 PM Akkana Peck <akkana@shallowsky.com> wrote:

> We didn't discuss HJR 9 at Friday's meeting, but it's coming up for
> discussion on Monday morning along with HB10 (the broadband bill we
> support). HJR 9 proposes a constitutional amendment to add
> "essential household services" (infrastructure that allows internet,
> electric, natural gas, water or wastewater services to be connected
> to a domicile) as an exception to the anti-donation clause, so the
> state could help subsidize (for example) fiber for broadband that
> for-profit corporations aren't interested in installing. It's
> sponsored by Allison and Chandler.
>
> I support HJR 9 personally, and I think we can support it under
> our high-speed internet position, but I wanted to check with you
> experts before saying so at the committee hearing.
>
> ...Akkana
> _______________________________________________
> Action mailing list
> Action@mailman.swcp.com
> https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/action
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.swcp.com/pipermail/action/attachments/20210207/30b7696e/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 18:49:37 -0700
From: Akkana Peck <akkana@shallowsky.com>
To: Barbara Calef <bfcalef@gmail.com>
Cc: LWVNM Action <action@mailman.swcp.com>
Subject: Re: [LWVNM Action] HJR 9 (exception to anti-donation clause
for broadband)
Message-ID: <20210208014937.GT2277@shallowsky.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Right, Tuesday, not Monday! Thanks, Barbara.

...Akkana

Barbara Calef writes:
> Akkana,
>
> The hearing is on Tuesday:
>
> Tuesday, February 9, 2021 - 08:30AM - Room ZOOM
>
> Barbara
>
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 3:59 PM Akkana Peck <akkana@shallowsky.com> wrote:
>
> > We didn't discuss HJR 9 at Friday's meeting, but it's coming up for
> > discussion on Monday morning along with HB10 (the broadband bill we
> > support). HJR 9 proposes a constitutional amendment to add
> > "essential household services" (infrastructure that allows internet,
> > electric, natural gas, water or wastewater services to be connected
> > to a domicile) as an exception to the anti-donation clause, so the
> > state could help subsidize (for example) fiber for broadband that
> > for-profit corporations aren't interested in installing. It's
> > sponsored by Allison and Chandler.
> >
> > I support HJR 9 personally, and I think we can support it under
> > our high-speed internet position, but I wanted to check with you
> > experts before saying so at the committee hearing.
> >
> > ...Akkana
> > _______________________________________________
> > Action mailing list
> > Action@mailman.swcp.com
> > https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/action
> >

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 19:18:47 -0700
From: George Richmond <geomrich1@comcast.net>
To: action@mailman.swcp.com
Subject: Re: [LWVNM Action] HJR 9 (exception to anti-donation clause
for broadband)
Message-ID: <7c6ff9ba-6b3f-8bb8-3966-b933e251abbf@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

As school kids must have access to the internet, YES.

However, consider that some of rural NM is served by Electric Co-Ops
which are not really controlled by NM law.

George Richmond

On 2/7/2021 3:59 PM, Akkana Peck wrote:
> We didn't discuss HJR 9 at Friday's meeting, but it's coming up for
> discussion on Monday morning along with HB10 (the broadband bill we
> support). HJR 9 proposes a constitutional amendment to add
> "essential household services" (infrastructure that allows internet,
> electric, natural gas, water or wastewater services to be connected
> to a domicile) as an exception to the anti-donation clause, so the
> state could help subsidize (for example) fiber for broadband that
> for-profit corporations aren't interested in installing. It's
> sponsored by Allison and Chandler.
>
> I support HJR 9 personally, and I think we can support it under
> our high-speed internet position, but I wanted to check with you
> experts before saying so at the committee hearing.
>
> ...Akkana
> _______________________________________________
> Action mailing list
> Action@mailman.swcp.com
> https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/action

--
George M. Richmond
152 Juniper Hill Road, NE
Albuquerque, NM 87122-1913

C: 505-280-2105
E: geomrich1@comcast.net

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Action mailing list
Action@mailman.swcp.com
https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/action

------------------------------

End of Action Digest, Vol 16, Issue 4
*************************************