Fair Districts For New Mexico (FDNM)
Summary of the Redistricting Session
updated 12/26/21
Below was the request of FDNM to the Legislature concerning the special session on redistricting:
A. Select the Citizen
Redistricting Committee (CRC) maps which best balance:
compliance with the Voting Rights Act; freedom
from partisan gerrymandering; protection of
communities of interest; adherence
to governmental boundaries including Tribal boundaries; and no
favoring incumbents.
B. If the Legislature amends the maps sent to them by the CRC they should provide detailed
explanation of why they amended the maps. This should be any changes made to maps since the
maps could not legally be amended. (We were told by the Senate leadership to file an IPRA request. To paraphrase journalist Gwyneth Doland, - that’s a hard no)
C. During the Special Session on Redistricting all legislative meetings should follow the
letter and spirit of the Open Meetings Act. The public’s business should be conducted in
full public view. The actions of the public bodies should be taken openly and all
deliberations made open to the public.
Note: Throughout the cycle from the New Mexico First Task Force in 2020, the
passing of the Redistricting Act in 2021, the appointments to the CRC and throughout
the CRC process, Fair Districts for New Mexico advocated for and supported the
inclusion of Native American voices. CRC Senate Concept maps A-1 and C-1 both
included Native American consensus. We are pleased that the New Mexico House
and Senate final maps include Native American consensus. Any criticism of the process should not be construed as criticism of that
inclusion.
Here is where the redistricting stands at the end of the session – updated 12/26/21
HOUSE
The House filed all CRC maps for both the
House and Public Education Commission
HB8 was based on CRC House map E-1,
but incorporated Native American consensus that had not been reached before the
CRC adjourned. HB 8 has passed both chambers and is on the Governor’s desk.
HB9 for the Public Education Commission is based on CRC Concept E-! passed
both chambers with minor changes and has been signed by the Governor.
The House passed SB1 – Congressional Redistricting that come over from
the Senate. It has been signed by the Governor.
The House passed SB2 – Senate maps that came over from the Senate
SENATE
The Senate was charged with
initiating the legislation for New Mexico Senate and Congressional maps.
We are displeased that the Senate did not file CRC maps for either the NM
Senate or Congress. At a minimum, the public had a right to see
these introduced.
SB1 – Congressional map was written behind closed doors and had to be revised
after resistance from the public. It passed both the Senate and House and has
been signed by the Governor.
SB2 – Senate District map was also written behind closed doors in the
Democratic caucus and in our analysis was mainly devised for incumbency
protection. In fact, at hearings many legislators said as much. It was stated
that SB2 was based upon CRC Concept C-1 and the sponsors bragged it contained 68%
of CRC Concept C-1. Note both CRC maps A-1 and C-1 had included Native
American consensus.
In Senate Judiciary a substitute for SB2 was proposed that eliminated the last
incumbent pairing, but in the process altered Native American consensus.
Luckily that was overturned with a Senate floor substitute. SB2 has passed
both chambers and is on the desk of the Governor.