I saw that this morning too.  The grass looked fine and added a nice touch to the landscaping, imo.

The city keeps telling me they don’t have the money to put in deciduous trees on the south side of my house, along the Coal side.  They put three live oaks which block the sun on our solar collectors.  The trees could be relocated to the places where other trees are missing.  We don’t want them here.  The contractors told us decidous trees would go in but they made a mistake. 

Wonder what they see as a problem with the grass.  The numerous ling of sight problems at the coners due to walls and other shrubs are much more of a problem than the low grass.

How do we get an explaination about this?  It would be nice if we knew of this before hand and could maybe have offered some solutions.  The grass was actually a nice feature.

Bob

On Dec 12, 2016, at 9:49 AM, Thomas Simic via Neighbors_nobhill-nm <neighbors_nobhill-nm@mailman.swcp.com> wrote:

I see the city workers on Coal removing plants, They told me that they are going to remove all the grasses that are planted and that the city wants to replace it with something lower, Evidently the city must have extra money to redo.  landscaping that looked fine when they dont have the money to replace trees on. Coal that have been run down by vehicles Pat Davis promised they would be replaced earlier this year. I think the trees are more important than replacing existing plants.

Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone

_______________________________________________
Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
Neighbors_nobhill-nm@mailman.swcp.com
http://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm