I agree with height restriction.  We must try to preserve the  integrity of our historical neighborhood.

thanks all.

Max

On Mar 11, 2017, at 6:37 PM, kingkb via Neighbors_nobhill-nm <neighbors_nobhill-nm@mailman.swcp.com> wrote:

Hi all,

I, too, wish to support the height restrictions described by Tandi. The question I have is this - while we are all agreeing with each other, how does that voice get beyond our group email to influence those who guide this process?

I don't want to have to write a letter, I'd be more than happy to sign a petition ..... or would it be reasonable to think that Pat Davis is monitoring these talks and taking down some helpful data?

Hoping to hear back, and hoping that all these great voices and ideas lead us to wonderful living in Nob Hill!

Karen at Hermosa/Marquette

On Mar 10 2017 11:55 AM, SARA via Neighbors_nobhill-nm wrote:

We also agree with the height restrictions described by Tandi.  3 stories is enough!

Sara & Ron Friederich

Grand & Amherst

 

---

From: "Wendy Barker via Neighbors_nobhill-nm" <neighbors_nobhill-nm@mailman.swcp.com>
To: "Flora Silva" <silva_f65@yahoo.com>
Cc: "neighbors nobhill-nm" <neighbors_nobhill-nm@mailman.swcp.com>, "Tandi Hufnagel" <tandiwe76@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 7:56:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Neighbors] New building height allowances along Central in        "upper"        Nob Hill

 

Thank you Tandi,

Yes. I agree. 65 feet is way too high like Flora said. 

 

Have a great day,

Wendy

On Mar 9, 2017, at 3:24 PM, Flora Silva via Neighbors_nobhill-nm <neighbors_nobhill-nm@mailman.swcp.com> wrote:

 

Well said, Tandi. This was discussed at the NH Board Meeting. Sixty-five feet is way too high!

 

Flora

 

 

---

From: Tandi Hufnagel via Neighbors_nobhill-nm <neighbors_nobhill-nm@mailman.swcp.com>
To: neighbors_nobhill-nm@mailman.swcp.com; patdavis@cabq.gov
Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 1:24 PM
Subject: [Neighbors] New building height allowances along Central in "upper" Nob Hill

HI Pat and neighbors,

 

I've been attending some of the recent zoning meetings that are planning new codes for the Central corridor, specifically relating to the new ART line and the stations.  My concern is building heights being proposed nearby the stations, specifically the Solano station.

 

The new height allowances would be 45 feet as a standard zoning height along Central, plus a 20 foot bonus for being near a station, equaling a total of 65 feet.  This would apply to the old Aztec motel lot for example.  That height is incredibly out of place for the surrounding neighborhood and the current commercial structures.  65 feet would allow for a FIVE story building - the idea of a five story building looming over Central as well as being an eyesore for many blocks in all directions is completely not in sync with historic preservation, community desires, or even basic aesthetics.  The three story condo at Central and Silver is already pushing the limit of what many neighborhood residents feel is an acceptable building height.

 

I've been to the business meetings and listened to the developers, and the neighborhood meetings and listened to residents.  As both a resident and Nob Hill business manager I understand both sides.  I agree that more density will benefit the neighborhood, adding vitality, more foot traffic, and increased business support.  However, this needs to be done within reasonable growth limits, and 65 feet is way, way above what is appropriate.

 

The current restrictions of 39 feet from Carlisle to Aliso, and 54 feet from Aliso to Washington, are the maximum that should be allowed, including near stations.  This would allow for consistent building development without creating glaringly irregular massings of "old" vs "new" developments that would not flatter this historic neighborhood.  These existing building heights restrictions are plenty high enough for a retail ground floor or wrap around a parking structure, and residential units above. 

 

Pat, since it sounds like you have a key hand in writing the new zoning for our district, I urge you to reconsider the 20 foot "bonus" proposed near the stations, and near the Solano station in particular. 

 

Thanks,

Tandi Hufnagel

 

_______________________________________________
Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
Neighbors_nobhill-nm@mailman.swcp.com
http://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm

 

_______________________________________________
Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
Neighbors_nobhill-nm@mailman.swcp.com
http://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm

_______________________________________________
Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
Neighbors_nobhill-nm@mailman.swcp.com
http://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm

 

_______________________________________________
Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
Neighbors_nobhill-nm@mailman.swcp.com
http://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm

 

_______________________________________________
Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
Neighbors_nobhill-nm@mailman.swcp.com
http://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm

_______________________________________________
Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
Neighbors_nobhill-nm@mailman.swcp.com
http://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm