[LWVNM Action] HOLTEC storage site a location fordisaster
Richard Mason
dickmasonnm at gmail.com
Tue Mar 24 10:03:15 MDT 2020
*HOLTEC storage site a location for disaster*
*Monday, March 23rd, 2020 at 12:02am – ABQ Journal*
By DAVID MCCOY - ALBUQUERQUE Resident
The HOLTEC site that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission would allow for
“interim storage” of 10,000 tons of nuclear reactor waste is a location for
disaster.
According to the N.M. Environment Department, the location was not chosen
for environmental safety but rather because it was “privately owned, near
highways and other federal land.” Further, the NRC environmental statement
ignores the geology and hydrology of the site that is riddled with playas,
sinkholes, fractured bedrock, subject to subsidence and hydrologic
transport of radioactive waste to groundwater.
The cost/benefit analysis of the NRC does not adequately consider the
adverse impact on the value of the region’s water resource, gas, minerals,
agriculture and wildlife from radioactive waste forever seeping into the
environment.
New Mexico already experienced the testing of a nuclear weapon. There is
irresponsible treatment of its citizens to suffer the exposure of nuclear
fallout, laboratory radioactive waste, piles of uranium tailings, dam
failure and the ensuing cancer and diseases often without warning,
compensation and medical treatment.
The concerns of New Mexico’s governor, Legislature, agencies, tribes and
public are most often blithely dismissed by the NRC as “beyond the scope”
of its environmental statement.
NRC is not doing the New Mexico public a favor with its faux safety
analysis. NRC’s failed record for protection of the public is not inspiring.
NRC allowed a Diablo Canyon reactor to operate after it was built backwards
on an eroding sea cliff in an area of tsunamis. NRC allowed the spent
nuclear fuel at San Onofre, Calif., to be placed next to the ocean in an
area for tsunamis and rising ocean levels. NRC allowed the Trojan Nuclear
Reactor in Oregon to expand spent fuel storage on the Columbia River
knowing of geologic evidence that an earthquake could be twice the strength
the reactor could withstand. NRC fails to consider hydrogen explosions for
U.S. reactors such as occurred at Fukushima.
The nation’s reactor waste was not generated in New Mexico and should
remain in place where produced until there is a suitable permanent geologic
repository without a second removal that may never occur.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.swcp.com/pipermail/action/attachments/20200324/cc75beec/attachment.html>
More information about the Action
mailing list