[LWVNM Action] NM’s budget crisis: It’s time to tap the permanent fund

Richard Mason dickmasonnm at gmail.com
Mon May 18 20:59:40 MDT 2020


*NM’s budget crisis: It’s time to tap the permanent fund*

*By *Rep. Antonio 'moe' Maestas / Albuquerque Democrat, Chair Of House
Commerce Committee And Rep. Javier Martinez / Albuquerque Democrat,
Co-chair Of House Taxation & Revenue Committee


*Sunday, May 17th, 2020 at 12:05am ABQ Journal*

Is $1,808,505,746 the amount of funding that would go to early childhood
educational services over a 10-year period if 1% of our state’s Land Grant
Permanent Fund were invested for that purpose? Close. Around $1.8 billion
is how much money the LGPF’s investment portfolio has lost in 2020. By
contrast, investing in our children is recession proof. One of the smartest
and most impactful things we can do in June’s special legislative session
is to pass a proposed constitutional amendment to use 1% of the LGPF for
early childhood services.

A 1% increase for early childhood education was characterized by the UNM
Economics Department in a recent white paper analysis as a positive
“alternative investment.” This alternative investment would be a game
changer for future generations and also helps jump-start our economy in the
short term. It would create close to 4,000 new jobs in the early education
field. It also increases tens of thousands of home economies by allowing
parents to join the workforce, finish their degrees or start their own
small businesses.

There are two schools of thought when it comes to these types of state
permanent funds. That they are development funds or generational equity
funds. We consider the LGPF to be a development fund. The lands and the
funds derived from them was granted by the federal government at the
inception of statehood so that New Mexico could develop a governmental
structure and grow an economy so as not to be dependent for its existence.
Those who view it strictly as a generational equity fund simply want to
distribute an annual percentage of the fund consistent with current dollar
value plus inflation to ensure each generation benefits equally.

Both views, ironically, call for an increased distribution from the LGPF.
The distribution is so low, 4.12% annually, relative to the average growth
of the fund, 11% annually, that an increase of 1% would actually track
better annual distribution with annual growth. When we do the math we
realize the current generation is actually being cheated because a
disproportionate amount of the fund is being reserved for future
generations at the expense of the current generation. Tragically, there
will always be a fictional “future generation” of poor children whom the
fund is being saved for that will always remain in the future.

Opponents insist on not distributing more than 5% annually. Many don’t
realize we don’t distribute 5% of the fund each year. We actually
distribute 5% of the preceding five-year average of the year-end amount of
the fund, which averages out to a 4.12% annual distribution.


<https://www.abqjournal.com/1456656/nms-budget-crisis-its-time-to-tap-the-permanent-fund.html#story-ad-0-skip-target>



Now another view is percolating to the surface, that it is a rainy-day fund
to be used during the darkest of times. Earlier this year the state
investment officer referred to the LGPF as “our state’s nest egg.” Gov.
Michelle Lujan Grisham said she would favor accessing the LGPF for one or
two fiscal years during “this extraordinary emergency.” No matter how you
slice it the LGPF has always been viewed as a buffer against future taxes.

The worst economic crisis imaginable is looming in our midst with a severe
budget crisis to follow. We cannot go back on our state’s commitment to
expanding early childhood education. Conditions for our most vulnerable
children will only get worse during this crisis. By accessing this
additional funding we not only avoid cutting existing programs, but we can
actually expand ECE programing. It will also free up valuable resources
that we can use for a stimulus package for small businesses.

To accomplish this we must act now. Let’s plant a tree that will bear fruit
immediately. We implore the governor to add the 1% for early childhood
initiative to the special session and hope the Senate joins the House in
passing this plan onto the November ballot. It’s time to let the voters
decide.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.swcp.com/pipermail/action/attachments/20200518/e3397093/attachment.htm>


More information about the Action mailing list