[LWVNM Action] Fwd: BREAKING: Judge denies motion to toss NM's congressional map - for now

Richard Mason dickmasonnm at gmail.com
Wed Apr 20 08:51:17 MDT 2022 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Richard Mason <polirich at aol.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 8:42 AM
Subject: Fwd: BREAKING: Judge denies motion to toss NM's congressional map
- for now
To: dickmasonnm at gmail.com <dickmasonnm at gmail.com>





-----Original Message-----
From: Kathleen Burke <kathleenmariaburke at yahoo.com>
To: Richard Mason <polirich at aol.com>
Sent: Tue, Apr 19, 2022 9:21 pm
Subject: Fw: BREAKING: Judge denies motion to toss NM's congressional
map,...



*Kathleen M. Burke*
Project Coordinator
*Fair Districts New Mexico*
505/907-5355
Connect w/ us: Website <http://http//fairdistrictsnm.org/> I Facebook
<http://https//www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100068791556875>


Judge denies motion to toss NM’s congressional map, for now
By Dan McKay / Journal Staff Writer
<https://www.abqjournal.com/author/dmckay>
Published: Tuesday, April 19th, 2022 at 4:55PM
Updated: Tuesday, April 19th, 2022 at 6:29PM
<https://www.abqjournal.com/2490384/judge-denies-motion-to-toss-nms-congressional-map-for-now.html?utm_source=single-post-notification&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Judge%20denies%20motion%20to%20toss%20NM%27s%20congressional%20map,%20for%20now&utm_edition=202204192258#>
Congressional map
SANTA FE — A state judge in Clovis rejected a motion Tuesday that would
have tossed out New Mexico’s new congressional map just days before the
first ballots are due in the mail.
But District Judge Fred Van Soelen also refused to dismiss the case,
leaving it alive with the potential to affect future elections after the
June 7 primary.
In a pair of rulings Tuesday, the judge said the Republican Party of New
Mexico and other plaintiffs had made a “strong, well-developed case that
(the new map) is a partisan gerrymander created in an attempt to dilute
Republican votes in Congressional races in New Mexico.”
Nevertheless, he said, he wasn’t making a final ruling on the merits of the
case and would need to hear more argument from the attorneys.
The judge also said it’s too late to change the map so close to the primary
election. The first ballots go out Saturday.
“To require a change this late in the game would bring a level of chaos to
the process that is not in the public’s or the candidate’s interests,” Van
Soelen said in a ruling denying the requested preliminary injunction.
He delivered the rulings a day after hearing arguments from the state
Republican Party and other plaintiffs — who described the new map as an
obvious and illegal partisan gerrymander designed to weaken the voting
strength of conservatives in southeastern New Mexico.
Attorneys for Democratic legislative leaders and Democratic Gov. Michelle
Lujan Grisham, in turn, said the map met every constitutional requirement
and cannot be overturned through judicial action.
In decisions issued Tuesday, Van Soelen rejected the Republican Party’s
motion for a preliminary injunction to prohibit use of the new districts in
this year’s primary and general elections.
The motion had asked the judge to order the state — at least for now — to
conduct elections under a map recommended by the state’s Citizen
Redistricting Committee, which was prohibited from using partisan data
during its meetings last year.
Despite ruling against the proposed injunction, Van Soelen agreed to keep
the redistricting lawsuit alive. He denied motions to dismiss the case.
The lawsuit will continue, he said, and he will hear “further argument at a
later date” before making a ruling that might affect future elections. The
map is set to be in place for 10 years, until results come in after the
2030 census.
Van Soelen said the plaintiffs had made a strong, well-developed case that
the map doesn’t “follow traditional districting principles, including a
lack of compactness, lack of preservation of communities of interest, and
failure to take into consideration political and geographic boundaries.”
But the judge stopped short of ruling that political gerrymandering would
violate the equal protection clause of the state Constitution, as alleged
by the GOP and other plaintiffs. He suggested it was an “undeveloped area”
of law not definitively answered by previous court rulings.
Attorneys for Lujan Grisham have argued that a claim of partisan
gerrymandering is a political question, not something a court can decide.
Nothing in state law or the Constitution, they said, establishes a standard
for how a court would decide what constitutes political gerrymandering.
Lujan Grisham spokeswoman Nora Meyers Sackett described the judge’s action
as a win for all voters by ensuring that “this attempt to interfere with
this year’s imminent elections will not go forward.”
In a written statement, she added: “Protecting New Mexicans’ access to the
ballot box is critical — any attempt to prevent New Mexicans from
participating in our democratic process goes against our values.”
The state Republican Party also hailed the judge’s rulings as a victory and
recognition of the strength of their lawsuit.
“The Court recognizes that we have strong evidence to support our claim of
blatant illegal gerrymandering that rips apart communities of interest and
disenfranchises voters across the state,” Republican Party Chairman Steve
Pearce said in a written statement.
Van Soelen took over the case just three weeks ago after a series of other
judges recused themselves or were bumped from the case.
The primary election is June 7, but the first ballots — for overseas voters
— are due in the mail by Saturday.
Alex Curtas, a spokesman for the Secretary of State’s Office, said the
agency was pleased it wouldn’t have to change maps just before the election.
Any “changes at this late hour,” he said, “would have led to disruption,
increased cost, and voter confusion.”
The state’s new congressional map was sponsored by Democratic lawmakers in
a special session last year and signed into law by Lujan Grisham.
It reorients New Mexico’s political landscape by splitting Albuquerque into
two congressional districts and breaking the conservative oil patch and
agricultural region of southeastern New Mexico into three districts.
The Republican Party contends the map was illegally designed to damage the
reelection chances of the only Republican in the state’s delegation: Yvette
Herrell of Alamogordo.
Under the new map, all three of the state’s congressional districts include
a mix of urban and rural areas, and all three seats lean Democratic,
according to analysis of past elections by redistricting contractor
Research & Polling Inc.
Supporters of the map say it would ensure every member of the delegation
responds to diverse set of constituents.

Take Care - Be Safe
[image: Mask][image: Pray][image: Pray][image: Heart][image: Notes]

Douglas R. Bailey
505-890-4466 home
505-350-1212


-----Original Message-----
From: Kathleen Burke <kathleenmariaburke at yahoo.com>
To: Douglas R Bailey <drbaileypm at aol.com>
Sent: Tue, Apr 19, 2022 7:53 pm
Subject: Re: BREAKING: Judge denies motion to toss NM's congressional
map,...

Thanks Doug. Will please  copy and paste the body of the article to me
please?  Thank you!

*Kathleen M. Burke*
Project Coordinator
*Fair Districts New Mexico*
505/907-5355
Connect w/ us: Website <http://http//fairdistrictsnm.org/> I Facebook
<http://https//www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100068791556875>



On Tuesday, April 19, 2022, 05:22:28 PM MDT, Douglas R Bailey <
drbaileypm at aol.com> wrote:


    Hi Kathleen how political can we get??

Take Care - Be Safe
[image: Mask][image: Pray][image: Pray][image: Heart][image: Notes]

Douglas R. Bailey
505-890-4466 home
505-350-1212


-----Original Message-----
From: ABQJournal Newsroom <webmaster at abqjournal.com>
To: DRBAILEYPM at AOL.COM
Sent: Tue, Apr 19, 2022 4:59 pm
Subject: BREAKING: Judge denies motion to toss NM's congressional map,...

Tuesday, April 19, 2022
<https://abqjournal.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6e246778846fb7f93485456c6&id=4d544827a1&e=11750de45a>
www.abqjournal.com »
<https://abqjournal.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6e246778846fb7f93485456c6&id=38c2d18dbe&e=11750de45a>
<https://abqjournal.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6e246778846fb7f93485456c6&id=bd2e12acbd&e=11750de45a>
Judge denies motion to toss NM's congressional map, for now
<https://abqjournal.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6e246778846fb7f93485456c6&id=1d200f6ad0&e=11750de45a>

A state judge in Clovis rejected a motion Tuesday that would have tossed
out New Mexico's new congressional map just days before the first ballots
are due in the mail....
READ MORE »
<https://abqjournal.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6e246778846fb7f93485456c6&id=5384a32f9a&e=11750de45a>
Subscribe to get exclusive content for just $10/month and get these great
benefits!
Subscribe
<https://abqjournal.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6e246778846fb7f93485456c6&id=90c17aeec3&e=11750de45a>

• Reduce ads and remove pop-ups & surveys on Abqjournal.com
• Get daily access to the paper with the eJournal Print Replica
• Receive discounts at local & national businesses with Readers Perks
• Enjoy simple account management with AutoPay – Automatic Payments
<https://abqjournal.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6e246778846fb7f93485456c6&id=ade17b92f6&e=11750de45a>
NEW MEXICO’S LEADING NEWS SOURCE

[image: Facebook]
<https://abqjournal.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6e246778846fb7f93485456c6&id=a4bb03655b&e=11750de45a>
[image: Twitter]
<https://abqjournal.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6e246778846fb7f93485456c6&id=275b08d2f6&e=11750de45a>
[image: Instagram]
<https://abqjournal.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6e246778846fb7f93485456c6&id=671cf4fb5f&e=11750de45a>
[image: LinkedIn]
<https://abqjournal.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6e246778846fb7f93485456c6&id=de5a4f19fc&e=11750de45a>
You received this email because you signed up for Albuquerque Journal news
alerts.

Albuquerque Journal 7777 Jefferson St. NE Albuquerque NM 87109 USA

Unsubscribe
<https://abqjournal.us4.list-manage.com/unsubscribe?u=6e246778846fb7f93485456c6&id=cebeada2dc&e=11750de45a&c=7a0c649414>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.swcp.com/pipermail/action/attachments/20220420/0f2771c0/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the Action mailing list