[Neighbors] building heights example - please reply with input
maria munguia via Neighbors_nobhill-nm
neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com
Sat Aug 19 08:07:17 MDT 2017
No words.
Maria Munguia Wellman, LISW, LCSW, PhD
ojos que no ven...corazon que no siente.
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 8/18/17, Susan Michie via Neighbors_nobhill-nm <neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [Neighbors] building heights example - please reply with input
To: "Damian Donckels" <damiandonckels at yahoo.com>, "Rob ." <subrek at hotmail.com>
Cc: "neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com" <neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com>
Date: Friday, August 18, 2017, 3:56 PM
Here
is an example of a building that could be erected in Nob
Hill at the corner of Bryn Mawr and Central under the new
IDO. Because there are no guidelines for new development
that would help to blend the old with the new architecture
anything goes. What do you think? Susan
From: Damian Donckels
via Neighbors_nobhill-nm
<neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com>
To: Rob .
<subrek at hotmail.com>
Cc:
"neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com"
<neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August
9, 2017 9:42 PM
Subject: Re:
[Neighbors] Need your voice regarding building heights -
please reply with input
Thank you Caeri. I am in full
agreement and support the new heights proposed.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 9,
2017, at 7:48 PM, Rob . via Neighbors_nobhill-nm <neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com>
wrote:
Caeri,
Thank You, and
well said.
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 9, 2017, at 5:06 PM, Caerleon T via
Neighbors_nobhill-nm <neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com>
wrote:
Hello,
We moved to Nob Hill to have better walking access to
transit and all the awesome businesses along Central (of
which we frequent recently even with all the construction).
We love the new sidewalks.
We are concerned about having enough density so that we
do not extend our resources towards subsidizing fringe
development - which means we need to allow for more density
in already built out areas.
There are a lot of urban form regulations (set back,
buffers, and sight lines) that did not exist in the past
zoning ordinance that will provide a much better aesthetic
for new development.
From my understanding it is quite expensive to do steel
building and elevators (which are needed over 3 or 4 stories
I think) so I doubt we will all of the sudden have a bunch
of six story buildings, but rather only in places where they
can truly be viable
which is probably close to transit stops. The parcels are
small sizes too so doing the max allowable height will be
difficult to attain.
Please keep in mind that zoning is almost like a long
term vision (we are growing as a city and it will be a slow
process) and more density/height is needed in certain areas
(like Nob Hill). Many of our younger generations may
actually appreciate this
both for the accessibility and the sustainable nature of
doing infill development.
My spouse and I support the heights that are
recommended by the plan.
Thanks for allowing an avenue for input - I realize I
may not be in the majority but wanted to give my two
cents.
Sincerely,
Caeri and Sasha (Chula Vista)
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017
at 7:03 PM, Joan Weissman via Neighbors_nobhill-nm
<neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com>
wrote:
This is very well stated, leslie Bowen,-- the
importance of HOW a building is designed being as important
or more important than the height. Although I also like the
general idea of keeping a lower profile in our neighborhood,
I think we should be aware
of the advantages of increasing density in urban areas. It
will bring more residents and visitors to help support
struggling local businesses, and density is also better for
the environment than sprawl. I'm just sayin'--- we
could work for some good and enforceable
design guidelines but not necessarily reject all ideas for
change. The city planners and architects might actually have
some good input.
Joan
Weissman
joan at joanweissman.com
505.265.0144
E-mail
sent from cell:
505.379.4851
On Jul 29, 2017, at 4:17 PM, Leslie Bowen via
Neighbors_nobhill-nm <neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.
swcp.com> wrote:
Pat and Nob Hill
neighbors,
I tend to agree with
height limits of some sort because I love seeing the sky
from Central and the surrounds. What is equally important
is how the new building will present itself to the street
level. Setbacks from the sidewalk, landscaping,
interior courtyards for restaurants and shops – these are
features that can really be molded to maintain a street
level sense of Nob Hill. A three story building like the
building that Staples vacated or the new condo building on
the corner of Carlisle and
Central is worse than a five story building with an open
front to the sidewalk, native plantings and a walkway front
to back to allow pedestrian wandering and sitting – and
maybe mandated public access to the rooftop to watch the
clouds move across the mountains.
Thanks for taking this
forward.
Leslie
Bowen
From:
Neighbors_nobhill-nm [mailto:neighbors_nobhill-nm-
bounces at mailman.swcp.com]
On Behalf Of Davis, Pat via Neighbors_nobhill-nm
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2017 1:19 PM
To:
neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman. swcp.com
Subject: Re: [Neighbors] Need your voice regarding
building heights - please reply with
input
Tandi,
Thanks for your message
and all of the others. You may have seen my response to
others on the Nob Hill list serve, but I wanted to share it
with you as well:
"I agree 100%.
I've had our staff write up a couple of amendments,
including one to eliminate the height bonuses proposed for
Nob Hill.
We will have several
committee hearings on the proposals before sending it to
full council for more input. Keep sending your
suggestions"
Pat
Pat Davis
-City Councilor
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 1:21
PM -0600, "Tandi Hufnagel via
Neighbors_nobhill-nm" <neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.
swcp.com> wrote:
Hi neighbors,
I'm sure you've
all seen the updates from Gary and others about the proposed
changes in building heights in Nob Hill.
I wanted to summarize
them because sometimes all the language in the codes can be
hard to understand.
Here are three
major changes that could dramatically change the streetscape
in Nob Hill:
1. The first
change is to raise the existing building height limit
from 39' to 45'. That would include all blocks
along Central in Nob Hill from Girard to
Aliso.
2. The second
change is to add an additional 20' to the height
limit in the areas near ART stations. In Nob Hill that
includes the stations at Bryn Mawr and Solano. This would
raise the height limit from the proposed 45'
up to a 65' (a five story building). The increased
height zone would include a block in either direction
(East-West) from the station. So this would apply along
Central from Aliso to Hermosa, and Richmond to Wellesley.
*Pat Davis, maybe you
can comment - has the additional height has already been
nixed for the Bryn Mawr station? In any case it is still
being proposed for the Solano station
zone.
3. The third
change is to allow the additional 20' height within
660' of the Washington station. This would cover
Morningside to Monroe. So the majority of East Nob Hill
could be built up to five stories. Also, the proposal
includes another 12' for any "Workforce"
projects for a grand total of 77' allowable building
height! That's at least a six story building.
Here's what is
needed: Please reply to this email with your feedback
on these proposals before this coming Wednesday.
Also, please tell our
councilman Pat Davis what you think! His email is:
patdavis at cabq.gov.
I think he reads these neighborhood emails too.
As our representative
it's up to Pat to help make the final decisions for our
neighborhood, and without your input he won't know what
the neighborhood prefers.
This is easy, you
don't need to go to any meetings, just reply to this
email and/or email Pat. If you do feel strongly and wish
to go to the meeting to add your voice, it will be August
16th in the evening. Please contact Gary Eyster
for more info at: meyster1 at comcast.net.
Thanks!
As I have written
before, I think these building heights are completely out of
character for Nob Hill. They do not fit the historic
architecture or human-scale texture of the neighborhood, and
they are unnecessary. The only people who
benefit are developers. Three stories is a good limit for
any commercial development along Central. I do support
increased density to help small local businesses survive,
however it has to be done with respect for the existing
neighborhood. Looking forward
to hearing your thoughts.
Tandi Hufnagel, Aliso
NE
==============================
=========================
This message has been
analyzed by Deep Discovery Email
Inspector.
______________________________
_________________
Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
Neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.
swcp.com
https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-
bin/mailman/listinfo/ neighbors_nobhill-nm
______________________________ _________________
Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
Neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.
swcp.com
https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-
bin/mailman/listinfo/ neighbors_nobhill-nm
_______________________________________________
Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
Neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com
https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm
_______________________________________________
Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing
list
Neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com
https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm
_______________________________________________
Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
Neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com
https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm
_______________________________________________
Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
Neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com
https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
More information about the Neighbors_nobhill-nm
mailing list