[Neighbors] Neighbors_nobhill-nm Digest, Vol 155, Issue 2
kingkb
kingkb at mail.swcp.com
Mon Jan 6 13:37:15 MST 2025
Thank you, Gary for shining a light on this issue and thank you, Tandi,
for sending this letter to Councilor Rogers (did you also send it
directly to her, or are we safe in assuming that she reads our
listserve?).
I hope to see something from the Councilor very soon to reassure us that
we have been heard and this will be postponed to allow for a more
complete and respectful process!
On Jan 5 2025 12:18 PM, Tandi Hufnagel via Neighbors_nobhill-nm wrote:
> Councilor Rogers,
>
> The details that Gary Eyster has shared from this bill are completely
> unacceptable.
>
> * The extremely short time limit to obtain signatures of neighbors for
> appeals is virtually impossible to meet in reality.
>
> * The potential for legal fees incurred by neighborhoods financially
> disincentivizes people from participating in the development of their
> own neighborhood. It is a punitive measure that favors developers over
> the people who live there.
>
> * The complete negation of building height limits is of particular
> concern for historic neighborhoods and should be handled in a sensitive
> manner.
>
> I oppose this bill which would likely have a large, lasting impact on
> my community.
>
> Sincerely,
> Tandi Hufnagel
> Hermosa Dr NE
>
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 12:00 PM
> <neighbors_nobhill-nm-request at mailman.swcp.com> wrote:
> Send Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list submissions to
> neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> neighbors_nobhill-nm-request at mailman.swcp.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> neighbors_nobhill-nm-owner at mailman.swcp.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Neighbors_nobhill-nm digest..."
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. My Concerns around City Council Bill O 24-69 (Gary Eyster)
> 2. Re: Neighbors] Nob Hill Public Safety (bluet-78504 at mypacks.net)
> 3. Re: My Concerns around City Council Bill O 24-69 (Mark Cleveland)
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Gary Eyster <meyster1 at me.com>
> To: "'Rogers, Nichole L.'" <nrogers at cabq.gov>, <district6 at cabq.gov>,
> "'Kirksey, Ziarra'" <zkirksey at cabq.gov>
> Cc: <meyster1 at me.com>, "'neighbors'" <neighbors at nobhill-nm.com>,
> Patricia Willson <patty at willsonstudio.com>
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 15:32:51 -0700
> Subject: [Neighbors] My Concerns around City Council Bill O 24-69
>
> Dear Councilor Rogers,
>
> This bill has only been around for a short time. I understand its
> sponsors want a vote on it Monday night, January 6.
>
> I am attaching a statement of opposition by the Intercoalition Council
> of Neighborhood Associations for ready reference.
>
> There has not been time for our neighborhood association to consider
> this in a deliberative fashion and develop a formal statement so I am
> writing you in a personal capacity.
>
> I hope you will act to slow down the process so the community and
> Council can deliberate and properly consider its monumental impacts,
> both intended and unintended, on the urban form of our community.
>
> There are 4 provisions that cause me serious concern:
>
> 1. 6-4-(U) (5) If neighborhoods appeal a Planning decision (like a
> zoning amendment or Zoning Hearing Officer decision) and lose they will
> be responsible for the applicant's additional costs, including legal
> costs.
>
> 2. 6-4(U) (2) (a) Standing to appeal will require signatures of a
> majority of property owners within 660 ft. This is incredibly onerous
> particularly because decisions must be appealed within 15 days.
>
> 3. Table 4-2; Dwelling, Multifamily will become permissive on R-1
> lots within 1,320 ft. of MS-PT areas. (Central Ave. in Nob Hill is a
> Main Street area). The IDO defines that term as _a building, multiple
> buildings, or a portion of a building located on a single lot,
> containing 3 or more dwelling units_.
>
> 4. Building Height Limits will be abolished within 1,320 ft. of
> MS-PT areas.
>
> Sharing your respect for community and community voices I appreciate
> anything you can do to slow this down for proper consideration.
>
> Kind regards, Gary
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: bluet-78504 at mypacks.net
> To: neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 04:44:43 +0000
> Subject: Re: [Neighbors] Neighbors] Nob Hill Public Safety
> Daniel,
>
> Thanks for reaching out.
>
> My question for the Commander is: Could we get a "Bait Parcel" program
> going that is modeled after the Bait Car/Bait Bike Program?
>
> Thanks,
>
> JS
>
> <-----Original Message-----
> <From: <neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com>
> <Sent: Jan 4, 2025 12:00 PM
> <To: <neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com>
> <Subject: Neighbors_nobhill-nm Digest, Vol 155, Issue 1
> <
>
> <Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 17:07:12 -0700
>> From: Daniel Carlos
>> To: Nob Hill Neighbor List Serve
> <Subject: [Neighbors] Nob Hill Public Safety
> <Message-ID:
> <Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> <Good evening Neighbors. I am meeting with the APD Commander for our
> Nob Hill area this coming Monday.
>
> <I wanted to reach out to our community and see if there are any
> questions you would like asked. Please let me know and I will do my
> best to get as <many answered as possible.
>
> <Hope you all had a great Holiday!
>
> <Best,
> <Daniel Carlos
> <NHNA Chair- Public Safety Committee
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mark Cleveland <abqcleve at comcast.net>
> To: Gary Eyster <meyster1 at me.com>
> Cc: "Nichole L. Rogers" <nrogers at cabq.gov>, district6 at cabq.gov, Ziarra
> Kirksey <zkirksey at cabq.gov>, neighbors <neighbors at nobhill-nm.com>,
> Patricia Willson <patty at willsonstudio.com>, meyster1 at me.com
> Bcc:
> Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 09:10:57 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Neighbors] My Concerns around City Council Bill O 24-69
> Very interesting. I find section 6-4-(U) (5) especially concerning.
> That's how British jurisprudence works. The United States correctly
> rejected that as it discourages challenging egregious acts of the rich
> and powerful. I find that section un-American and therefore
> unacceptable.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mark Cleveland
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 5, 2025, at 8:04 AM, Gary Eyster via Neighbors_nobhill-nm
> <neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Councilor Rogers,
>
> This bill has only been around for a short time. I understand its
> sponsors want a vote on it Monday night, January 6.
>
> I am attaching a statement of opposition by the Intercoalition Council
> of Neighborhood Associations for ready reference.
>
> There has not been time for our neighborhood association to consider
> this in a deliberative fashion and develop a formal statement so I am
> writing you in a personal capacity.
>
> I hope you will act to slow down the process so the community and
> Council can deliberate and properly consider its monumental impacts,
> both intended and unintended, on the urban form of our community.
>
> There are 4 provisions that cause me serious concern:
>
> 1. 6-4-(U) (5) If neighborhoods appeal a Planning decision (like a
> zoning amendment or Zoning Hearing Officer decision) and lose they will
> be responsible for the applicant's additional costs, including legal
> costs.
>
> 2. 6-4(U) (2) (a) Standing to appeal will require signatures of a
> majority of property owners within 660 ft. This is incredibly onerous
> particularly because decisions must be appealed within 15 days.
>
> 3. Table 4-2; Dwelling, Multifamily will become permissive on R-1
> lots within 1,320 ft. of MS-PT areas. (Central Ave. in Nob Hill is a
> Main Street area). The IDO defines that term as _a building, multiple
> buildings, or a portion of a building located on a single lot,
> containing 3 or more dwelling units_.
>
> 4. Building Height Limits will be abolished within 1,320 ft. of
> MS-PT areas.
>
> Sharing your respect for community and community voices I appreciate
> anything you can do to slow this down for proper consideration.
>
> Kind regards, Gary
>
> <2025_01_03 ICC LTR O-69Final.pdf>
> _______________________________________________
> Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
> Neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com
> https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm
> This Message Sent To: abqcleve at comcast.net
> _______________________________________________
> Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
> Neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com
> https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm
_______________________________________________
Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
Neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com
https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm
This Message Sent To: kingkb at swcp.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.swcp.com/pipermail/neighbors_nobhill-nm/attachments/20250106/e6ca042f/attachment.htm>
More information about the Neighbors_nobhill-nm
mailing list