[LWVNM Action] Another reason the SOS office should be fully funded

[Elene]

 Which Democratic leaders would those be, and exactly what did they say?  It's hard to imagine supporting this.
Elene

    On Monday, February 24, 2025 at 10:51:44 AM MST, Nandini Kuehn via Action <action at mailman.swcp.com> wrote:   

 It makes me sick that Dem leaders are  applauding Jay Block when he instigated election deniers and gave them a free platform at County meetings. At least one regular denier wanted to take Anne Brady Romero to the village square and "deal" w her.
Nandini 
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025, 10:47 AM Richard Mason via Action <action at mailman.swcp.com> wrote:





| Looming Risks for Our Elections |
| The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, a key player in protecting our elections, has become another target in the administration’s onslaught against federal agencies. Last week, the agency was ordered to stop all election security work pending an internal review. This move, along with others outlined in the conservative policy agenda Project 2025, threatens to leave officials with fewer tools to fend off cyber and physical threats to our election systems. Lawmakers, governors, and other leaders will need to step in to fill the growing security gap.
The Trump Administration Is Going After Our Elections Too | Brennan Center for Justice
Let legislators know they need to fully fund the SOS office to protect out voting system that was voted best in the country by the MIT Election Lab
Dick Mason




 |


_______________________________________________
Action mailing list
Action at mailman.swcp.com
https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/action

_______________________________________________
Action mailing list
Action at mailman.swcp.com
https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/action
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.swcp.com/pipermail/action/attachments/20250224/d542d929/attachment.htm>