[NMCycling] do send letters to Grisham
David Porter
frogeye at porterscustom.com
Sun Jul 12 13:25:23 MDT 2020
IMO, irrespective of whether one wears a mask, I'd suggest you include a suggestion that the Governor step down in your letters. Dave
On July 12, 2020, at 1:11 PM, ROBERT CIPOLETTI via Bike-racers <bike-racers at mailman.swcp.com> wrote:
There's a subset of the NM cycling community that does not consider cycling alone as cycling at all. They not only routinely travel in groups of as many as 4-5, they are typically functioning at the extreme when it comes to being self-absorbed. I can only imagine what people, who have become accustomed to passersby going to great lengths to distance themselves, must think of this behavior. I have no way of knowing, but would not be at all surprised if complaints regarding this behavior have reached the governor's ears, and have contributed to the decision regarding "outdoor exercise", in general. The point being, given this reality, the likelihood of any special dispensation for cyclists, solitary or otherwise, is hardly likely.
Will everyone start wearing a mask while walking their dog, or risk being stopped by the police? Seriously? Will people stop removing their masks as soon as they hit the p-lot at Costco, or risk citation? Don't think so. Will this ruling be enforced selectively, if at all? You bet your sweet chamois it will. Are you, as a cyclist, solitary or otherwise, one of law enforcement's biggest PITA's in the first place? Um, possibly. Are cyclists sufficiently high profile that disregarding the rule will appear to be particularly disrespectful to everyone who already resents your mere presence on the road? Hmmm.
I don't think it makes a bit of sense to require a solitary cyclist who's considerate of passersby to wear a mask. The decision to require masks in public while "exercising", but still allow *any* kind of seating in a restaurant was not an oversight, but rather a conscious political decision designed to minimize unpopularity. But, practically speaking, you can either wear, or at least appear that you're wearing, a mask while cycling, or you can opt for the target on your back. Or, if you insist on not wearing a mask in public, then go out to dinner instead.
RDC
> On 07/10/2020 2:25 PM Heidi Snell via Bike-racers <bike-racers at mailman.swcp.com> wrote:
>
>
> Fellow cyclists:
>
> I think MLGrisham needs to hear from many cyclists as to why there
> needs to be an exception the mask rule. The letter can be short and
> easy, simply asking to not wearing a mask when cycling while also
> keeping a good social distance. Others of you have already written
> good reasons and those can be incorporated into a letter. I don't
> think she needs a huge list of reasons, but she does need to hear
> from enough people to make time to make a change in the ruling.
>
> My thoughts are with the mask law and a fine involved, it seems to me
> the cyclist/police interactions could just get worse. Police could
> easily pull a cyclist over as an easy target. Without an exception to
> the mask ruling, a ticket could be a plausible result.
>
> A letter is easy and she just needs to hear from the New Mexicans she
> is trying to protect. I expect she is willing to make a change with
> proper input.
>
> I certainly would not want to be in her shoes with the massive
> pressure she has trying to keep as many people safe as she can while
> maintaining a functioning state.
>
> cheers,
> heidi
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bike-racers mailing list
> Bike-racers at mailman.swcp.com
> https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bike-racers
_______________________________________________
Bike-racers mailing list
Bike-racers at mailman.swcp.com
https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bike-racers
More information about the Bike-racers
mailing list