[NMCycling] do send letters to Grisham

ROBERT CIPOLETTI rdcipoletti at comcast.net
Sun Jul 12 15:51:30 MDT 2020


Just for the record, Dave, I don't feel that way at all. This is the first time that I've been inclined to criticize Grisham's handling of this nightmare, and I'm thankful that we're not being led by the likes of the governors of the surrounding states.

In the absence of a lockdown except for essential services, this mask-while-exercising-outdoors is a pointless flail. On the other hand, given the point I made earlier, it can easily be likened to a decision to close the beach because of the spring breakers.

The underlying problem is not governors like Grisham, it's the multitude of incredibly stupid people in this country that don't give a shit about anything other than advertising their unbridled selfishness. So, yes, there are going to be many others who are capable of conducting themselves during the pandemic without negatively impacting others (e.g., solo cyclists) who will have to suffer as a result.

RDC

> On 07/12/2020 1:25 PM David Porter <frogeye at porterscustom.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> IMO, irrespective of whether one wears a mask, I'd suggest you include a suggestion that the Governor step down in your letters. Dave
> 
> On July 12, 2020, at 1:11 PM, ROBERT CIPOLETTI via Bike-racers <bike-racers at mailman.swcp.com> wrote:
> 
> There's a subset of the NM cycling community that does not consider cycling alone as cycling at all. They not only routinely travel in groups of as many as 4-5, they are typically functioning at the extreme when it comes to being self-absorbed. I can only imagine what people, who have become accustomed to passersby going to great lengths to distance themselves, must think of this behavior. I have no way of knowing, but would not be at all surprised if complaints regarding this behavior have reached the governor's ears, and have contributed to the decision regarding "outdoor exercise", in general. The point being, given this reality, the likelihood of any special dispensation for cyclists, solitary or otherwise, is hardly likely.
> 
> Will everyone start wearing a mask while walking their dog, or risk being stopped by the police? Seriously? Will people stop removing their masks as soon as they hit the p-lot at Costco, or risk citation? Don't think so. Will this ruling be enforced selectively, if at all? You bet your sweet chamois it will. Are you, as a cyclist, solitary or otherwise, one of law enforcement's biggest PITA's in the first place? Um, possibly. Are cyclists sufficiently high profile that disregarding the rule will appear to be particularly disrespectful to everyone who already resents your mere presence on the road? Hmmm.
> 
> I don't think it makes a bit of sense to require a solitary cyclist who's considerate of passersby to wear a mask. The decision to require masks in public while "exercising", but still allow *any* kind of seating in a restaurant was not an oversight, but rather a conscious political decision designed to minimize unpopularity. But, practically speaking, you can either wear, or at least appear that you're wearing, a mask while cycling, or you can opt for the target on your back. Or, if you insist on not wearing a mask in public, then go out to dinner instead.
> 
> RDC
> 
> 
> > On 07/10/2020 2:25 PM Heidi Snell via Bike-racers <bike-racers at mailman.swcp.com> wrote:
> > 
> >  
> > Fellow cyclists:
> > 
> > I think MLGrisham needs to hear from many cyclists as to why there 
> > needs to be an exception the mask rule. The letter can be short and 
> > easy, simply asking to not wearing a mask when cycling while also 
> > keeping a good social distance.  Others of you have already written 
> > good reasons and those can be incorporated into a letter. I don't 
> > think she needs a huge list of reasons, but she does need to hear 
> > from enough people to make time to make a change in the ruling.
> > 
> > My thoughts are with the mask law and a fine involved, it seems to me 
> > the cyclist/police interactions could just get worse. Police could 
> > easily pull a cyclist over as an easy target. Without an exception to 
> > the mask ruling, a ticket could be a plausible result.
> > 
> > A letter is easy and she just needs to hear from the New Mexicans she 
> > is trying to protect.  I expect she is willing to make a change with 
> > proper input.
> > 
> > I certainly would not want to be in her shoes with the massive 
> > pressure she has trying to keep as many people safe as she can while 
> > maintaining a functioning state.
> > 
> > cheers,
> > heidi
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bike-racers mailing list
> > Bike-racers at mailman.swcp.com
> > https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bike-racers
> _______________________________________________
> Bike-racers mailing list
> Bike-racers at mailman.swcp.com
> https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bike-racers


More information about the Bike-racers mailing list