[Neighbors] Fwd: Larger neon sign for the Carlisle Condos.
Juan Carlos Holmes via Neighbors_nobhill-nm
neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com
Fri Mar 23 14:26:13 MDT 2018
It was explained to you twice, in the second reply to your initial e-mail,
and again in Councillor Davis’ first reply to the thread. Just because you
ignored the explanation doesn’t mean it wasn’t there, Ms. Salinas. While
Messrs. Bawcum and Dixon’s worries that near-invariable grants of variances
may undermine the standards in the first place strike me as legitimate
issues to address, choosing to ignore the words of others simply because
they’ve committed the egregious sin of disagreeing with you does no one any
favors.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:15 PM Veronica Salinas via Neighbors_nobhill-nm <
neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com> wrote:
> Dear neighbors:
>
> Astute observers will note that while city officials state my
> interpretation is incorrect four times in three different e-mails, none say
> *why* my interpretation is incorrect.
>
> Any guesses as to why city officials eagerly point to my error, but
> repeatedly fail to say why I am in error?
>
> -Veronica
>
>
> On Thursday, March 22, 2018, 2:35:38 PM MDT, Davis, Pat via
> Neighbors_nobhill-nm <neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com> wrote:
>
>
> Neighbors, I wanted to respond to the concerns shared on the Listserve
> this morning about the sign approval for The Carlisle.
>
> It was mistakenly shared that this change would apply to other properties
> in the neighborhood. I asked our planning staff and attorneys to review
> that allegation. You can see their analysis below.
>
> As always, if you have other questions about land-use you can always ask
> the staff in my office to provide some guidance. That’s what we are here
> for.
>
> Pat Davis
> -City Councilor
> _____________________________
> From: Foran, Sean M. <seanforan at cabq.gov>
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 2:00 PM
> Subject: FW: [Neighbors] Larger neon sign for the Carlisle Condos.
> To: Davis, Pat <patdavis at cabq.gov>
>
>
> Councilor Davis,
>
>
>
> I asked Shanna to take a look at Veronica’s interpretation of the recent
> Administrative Amendments; she is incorrect in saying that the amendments
> apply to the entire Sector Plan.
>
>
>
> Shanna’s response is below.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Sean
>
>
>
>
>
> ***
>
>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
>
>
> Veronica’s interpretation of Administrative Amendments (AA) is not correct
> – the allowed deviations*do not* apply to the entire sector plan. The
> Notice of Decision for the two recent AAs in the Nob Hill area
> (Copper/Aliso and Carlisle/Central) specifically state that the allowed
> deviations are*property specific* (see below). The same deviations
> allowed via these AAs would not be allowed on any other properties outside
> of the properties that made each request. This means, in the most recent
> example,*only* The Carlisle development will be able to utilize the
> additional sign height. I also reviewed the LUHO’s Notice of Decision for
> both cases and did not see him elude to the idea that the AAs would be
> applicable throughout the sector plan.
>
>
>
> I’ve chatted with Council’s legal staff, who typically reviews and handles
> land use appeals, and he concurred with this position.
>
>
>
> [image: cid:image001.png at 01D3C1BF.85BEBAA0]
>
>
>
> [image: cid:image002.png at 01D3C1BF.85BEBAA0]
>
>
>
> *Shanna Schultz**,**MPA, MCRP*
>
> Policy Analyst - Planning
>
> Albuquerque City Council
>
> 505.768.3185
>
> smschultz at cabq.gov
>
>
>
>
> =======================================================
>
> This message has been analyzed by Deep Discovery Email Inspector.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
> Neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com
> https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm
> _______________________________________________
> Neighbors_nobhill-nm mailing list
> Neighbors_nobhill-nm at mailman.swcp.com
> https://mailman.swcp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neighbors_nobhill-nm
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.swcp.com/pipermail/neighbors_nobhill-nm/attachments/20180323/f3973388/attachment.html>
More information about the Neighbors_nobhill-nm
mailing list